Thursday, March 26, 2009
Gearmotors vs Steppers
They're pretty much ubiquitous as a choice, so there's got to be lots of reasons they're usually picked over the often-cheaper gearmotors.
The obvious answer is that gearmotors don't include shaft encoding unless you add it yourself, where the stepper motor has this built in as a function of how one drives them. However, with the possibility looming of teaching a RepRap to fabricate gearboxes, I'd think that shaft encoding plus a sixty-cent motor would be possible, and a big reduction in the vitamin requirements. If the only benefit of stepper motors was "native" encoding, it seems there'd already be a number of reprappers scrambling to get that brass ring of a printable gearbox, even if it were large, clunky, and required finicky sensors.
So I figure there's gotta be another reason the stepper motor is better than the gearmotor. Is it a torque/speed thing? Is it power? Lupus? Is it Lupus?
Okay, okay, it's never Lupus...
The above gearbox, incidentially, is now available on Thingiverse and should be fully reprappable. Like I know. My RepRap is still a pile of old printer parts :3
1) They're easy to use. No closed loop control, no calibrating of rotary encoders, and simple software as well. Using servos requires you to have sophisticated overshoot handling, and careful management of acceleration.
2) Servos large enough to run a cnc machine often require "tuning" which can be a challenging process if you don't know what you're doing (and sometimes even if you do)
3) No gear slip. Using gears reduces the accuracy of the drive. That's why many cncs and repraps use steppers to drive directly. If you put a gear in between the stepper and the screw, you introduce some inaccuracy.
4) DC motors wear out much faster.
5) DC motors emit a lot of radio frequency interference, requiring a suppressor, adding to the cost.
Steppers might be expensive, but they solve even more problems than I knew about. If the vitamins were a single circuit board and three steppers, a RepRap would be a pretty cheap machine...
Cool geartrain design!
I think the teeth will be too small for my reprap at the moment with a 0.5mm filament, but still, it's good to see more designs out there.
Interesting that you did it in AOI and then Blender. Why the switch?
Basically they are stepper motors with low resolution, low inductance and very low resistance. This makes for rather special drive requirements. However, they offer high speed, which may compensate for the low resolution when combined with a threaded bar as a drivechain and thereby eliminate the need for belts or chains.
Now, you have an AC servo. This means that it has effectively infinite resolution, but it also requires closed loop control, so the resolution is the resolution of the position sensor.
Net effect: You have a servo but without all the down-sides that nophead listed.
Still has all the problems that shader listed. In addition, it requires a control system on the same complexity level as a stepper driver with position feedback.
The gear train is designed to print with paste at 0.5mm thickness, although I haven't had the MakerBot folks confirm it works yet. If you try printing the Rome gear it should be fairly clear if it's going to work overall or not...
I didn't do any of this in AOI. The gearbox is 100% Blender. I don't have anything in particular against AOI, it's just not as sophisticated as Blender, and once you get over the learning curve, Blender is actually a really sweet modeler.
(Also I think there's some weird neurological disorder you have to have to like Blender.)
So a properly controlled and driven BLDC or AC servo motor will typically offer much better performance Watt for Watt in comparison to a stepper motor, but the performance does come with a cost.
I don't know what to use for servos and I'm new to RepRap. Would you like to get involved in the design?
Links to this post: